I'm looking for sources that support what is the status quo in
non-shall-issue places -- it's OK to own a gun in the home, but people
ought not be able to carry guns in public, presumably because the threat
to others is greater from public carrying than just from home
possession. I've heard this argument before, but I want to cite to it.
If you have sources, please e-mail me off-list, at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking for responses to this argument, only instances of it. Many
thanks,
Eugene
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
