Page 10 indicates that none of the officers were killed with "assault
weapons" (the term "rifle" seems ambiguous though), which contradicts VPC's
"Officer Down" document and what Diane Feinstein has recently been saying.

Which raises a question I've not had time to research: What is the price
delta of firearms purchased "on the street" and at gun shows or in gun
stores?  This report indicates that the offenders bought their weapons on
the street and used "availability" and "familiarity" as top motivators, but
I wonder what part price plays in that decision.  Since most street
criminals make a pathetic wage, I suspect that street guns are relatively
cheap and thus a better deal.

Page 28 - utterly unsurprising that 100% of the offenders had priors.

Guy Smith

Author, Gun Facts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 <http://www.GunFacts.info> www.GunFacts.info 

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph E. Olson
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 9:06 AM
To: List Firearms Reg
Subject: New FBI study

 

http://www.forcesciencenews.com/home...html?serial=62

"New findings on how offenders train with, carry and deploy the weapons they
use to attack police officers have emerged in a just-published, 5-year study
by the FBI.

Among other things, the data reveal that most would-be cop killers:

--show signs of being armed that officers miss;

--have more experience using deadly force in "street combat" than their
intended victims;

--practice with firearms more often and shoot more accurately;

--have no hesitation whatsoever about pulling the trigger. "If you
hesitate," one told the study's researchers, "you're dead. You have the
instinct or you don't. If you don't, you're in trouble on the street...."

These and other weapons-related findings comprise one chapter in a 180-page
research summary called "Violent Encounters: A Study of Felonious Assaults
on Our Nation's Law Enforcement Officers." The study is the third in a
series of long investigations into fatal and nonfatal attacks on POs by the
FBI team of Dr. Anthony Pinizzotto, clinical forensic psychologist, and Ed
Davis, criminal investigative instructor, both with the Bureau's Behavioral
Science Unit, and Charles Miller III, coordinator of the LEOs Killed and
Assaulted program."

One of the unsurprising tidbits...

"Predominately handguns were used in the assaults on officers and all but
one were obtained illegally, usually in street transactions or in thefts. In
contrast to media myth, none of the firearms in the study was obtained from
gun shows. What was available "was the overriding factor in weapon choice,"
the report says. Only 1 offender hand-picked a particular gun "because he
felt it would do the most damage to a human being."

Researcher Davis, in a presentation and discussion for the International
Assn. of Chiefs of Police, noted that none of the attackers interviewed was
"hindered by any law--federal, state or local--that has ever been
established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws.""

 

 

Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.         o-  651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law             f-   651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                        c-  612-865-7956
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                               

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to