> > speaking of MO's, I see an odd connection between Cho at VA
> > Tech and Voong at Binghamton - blocking exits to ensure a higher
> > kill rate).
> 
> Is that how you interpret this behavior?  I had always assumed they
> had blocked ENTRANCES to impede prompt apprehension.

No, these were exit blocks.  Cho (VA Tech) chained multiple doors shut
before his second killing spree in classrooms.  To prevent apprehension he
would not have to have used chains/lock.  Simpler ways to keep cops at bay
(today's Pittsburgh cop killer held them off for hours).

Voong parked his car against the back door of the building before going into
the front, where he started shooting the receptionists.  This was a box'em
in play.

Harris and Klebold had a slightly different MO.  They placed canister bombs
in the cafeteria and waited outside with the intent of shooting escapees
from the blast.  Because they were not skilled bomb makers, the devices did
not detonate so they went with plan-b -- shooting up the joint.

> 
> > I'm looking for any studies that have attempted to correlate the
> > common
> > traits, intentions or psychological profiles of exit strategy killers.
> 
> I know there has been a concerted attempt to correlate these killings
> with the use of psycho-pharmaceuticals, most notably by the Church of
> Scientology.  

<grin>  See the disclaimer at the bottom of http://www.ssristories.com/.
This site catalogs news stories of violent acts where SSRI drugs were
reported to have been taken by the assailant.  Not even close to conclusive
but it does make one ponder.

Guy Smith
www.GunFacts.info
 

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to