> > The 9th failed to properly define "sensitive places" > > > Unless clarified on this point, the finding on incorporation is > > really only dictum, even if called a conclusion. > > Not quite. For example, any future law like the recent San Francisco > gun ban is now right out. No more Morton Groves, at least not in the > 9th.
I wonder what impact this may have on the Chicago case. Clearly it doesn't apply in their district, and as Eugene's analysis (http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_04_19-2009_04_25.shtml#1240254351) indicts the odds of the case going up the judicial food chain is low. But I have to imagine that the City's lawyers are reading this with interest and worrying somewhat about their odds of success. Guy Smith www.GunFacts.info _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
