Sure, if one is banned from possessing, one is banned from carrying. My point was simply that the statute seemed to suggest it was referring to some federal carry law, and I was wondering what that might be. But it might well be an opaque way of referring to the possession restrictions.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:firearmsregprof- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Curley > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Indiana shall-issue and noncitizens > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:44:40 -0700 > "Volokh, Eugene" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sure, but I take it that those are *possession* limits, not > > carrying limits, right? > > Can you carry without possessing? > > -- > > Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign > Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards > and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email > http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email > > Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to [email protected] > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. > Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can > read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the > messages to others. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
