I will point out that this is not the first time that Scalia has issued a 
scathing rebuttal opinion to a dissent from one of his retiring "liberal" 
colleagues; in particular, Scalia's concurrence in Callins v. Collins, 510 U.S. 
1141 (1994) comes to mind -- in that case, Justice Blackmun declared in a 
dissent his opinion that the death penalty was unconstitutional in all cases, 
to which Scalia responded ... strongly, shall we say.

Best regards
Aaron Clements

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joseph E. Olson 
  To: Guy Smith ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:10 PM
  Subject: Re: Scalia in McDonald


  Intellectual bankruptcy can only hide behind "judicial courtesy" for so long. 
 The written Constitution is meaningless to the "Liberals" on the Supreme 
Court.  As Justice Thomas once said "they make it up as they go."  I think 
Justice Scalia just reached the breaking point with Stevens.


  
*****************************************************************************************
  Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                                   o-   
651-523-2142  
  Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)                    f-    
651-523-2236
  St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                                 c-   
612-865-7956
  [email protected]                              
http://law.hamline.edu/node/784                      


  >>> "Guy Smith" <[email protected]> 6/28/2010 2:40 PM >>>

  Perhaps I simply have read too few decisions by the Supremes, but Scalia 
mocking evisceration of Stevens’ dissent seems exceptional.  Granted Steven’s 
opinions have recently entered the realm of science fiction, but Scalia’s 
assault treats Stevens (rightly) with a very heavy hand.

   

  Guy Smith

  www.GunFacts.info

   

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  To post, send message to [email protected]
  To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

  Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; 
people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) 
forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to