On May 31, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Greg Jacobs wrote:

> http://www.auctionarms.com/news/article/20110527-District-Court-Finds-No-Constitutional-Right-to-Conceal-Carry.cfm
> 
> http://joshblackman.com/blog/?p=7002
> 
> Call me dense, but I think I agree with this.....and that frightens me!!!!  I 
> hate agreeing with such things!!!!  Please correct me!

This is the usual legal sophistry: "Reasonable regulation of a right is 
permissible; this is a regulation; therefore it is reasonable."

> "As Defendants contend, regulating concealed firearms is an essential part of 
> Yolo County’s efforts to maintain public safety and prevent both gun-related 
> crime and, most importantly, the death of its citizens."

This is their contention, to be sure, but "reasonable" requires more than mere 
claims.

Was any burden of proof satisfied by the County?  Can they prove that 
regulating the concealed carry of firearms by the law-abiding (certainly no one 
pretends this regulation will affect the behavior of the non-law-abiding) 
really enhances public safety and prevents death?

So far, evidence from Vermont, Alaska, and Arizona says the opposite -- much 
like Lott's seminal work showed in 1998 for gun ownership itself.  As Lott put 
it during his 1997 "public mugging" on CNN, his data moved the debate from 
"does this help or hurt crime statistics" to "does this help crime statistics 
or have no measurable effect?"

We are now able to begin to make a good case that we have done the same for 
concealed carry in America, and no matter which answer turns out to be true, 
Yolo County's argument is destroyed.

--
       Escape the Rat Race for Peace, Quiet, and Miles of Desert Beauty
         Take a Sanity Break at The Bunkhouse at Liberty Haven Ranch
                                         http://libertyhaven.com



_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to