On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:46:31 -0500 "Raymond Kessler" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Agreed: The JAMA publishes a lot of trash research on the gun issue. > Peer review is, IMHO, very weak in this area. See also > > http://www.secondamendmentlibrary.com/10/KESSLER.htm > > Methinks the folks complaining about bad science on guns should be talking to the folks complaining about bad science on climate change. http://climateaudit.org/2011/06/14/ipcc-wg3-and-the-greenpeace-karaoke/ -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
