On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:05:39 +0400, Alex Peshkoff <peshk...@mail.ru> wrote: > On 07/27/11 16:56, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 27/07/2011 09:45, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> If we can provide such restrictions (probably the best will be to have >>> fixed list of acceptable "uses"), this can be enough. >>> >> And just an invalid pointer access will turn down your server who tried >> to be secure. > > Unfortunately yes. > BTW, how is it solved in Java?
Java itself does not support pointer manipulation, and it applies bounds checking of arrays. Only potential for problems would be the interface native Firebird <> Java. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
