Dmitry Yemanov skriver:
Also possible as a secondary option, let's just decide what's better - keep polluting GFIX with new features or create new command-line tools for the every new feature (or a set of features).
From a user perspective, "gfix" sounds like a tool to fix problems with the database, so I'd vote to either change the name to something more generic, e.g. "gset" or "gconfig" or "gtool" (why "g" by the way?), or to keep its feature set within the area of "fixing problems".
Just my humble opinion... Kjell -- ------------------------------ Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post:kjell.ri...@datadia.se Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64
<<attachment: kjell_rilbe.vcf>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
