On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote: > I'm not sure it really is a problem but given the text on top of the > file, I can't be sure it is OK either, especially when our legal team > considers it to be bad enough to exclude it from OpenSuSE. This is why > I wanted to discuss it in the list. (Yes, I too would prefer to live > in a world where a developer doesn't need law school more then computer > science.) > > The problem I see is that the source tarball contains a file claiming it > contains a code proprietary to AT&T and not referring to any license. > For anyone who gets the tarball it means they don't now what they can or > cannot do with it - and therefore with the source tree as a whole.
I wonder why you don't ask about whether distribution of this file is ok directly in AT&T?.. They claim rights on the file, so they know the answer for sure. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
