In fact it does not work yet. See issues on gihub.
2012/5/31 Leyne, Sean <[email protected]>
> Henri,
>
> > I am doubtful, I do not understand these results.
> > Why it is faster to use one connection with small data size ?
>
> I do not agree with your testing analysis/methodology...
>
> When testing using an empty database the timing values are so small that
> any small different gets magnified -- for the empty database is difference
> between pool size = 1 and 20 is only 0.4 ms!! That is **nothing** I would
> worry about!
>
> Yes, is it a difference of 50% to the baseline value, but in the larger
> scheme of things there are operations which will take far more time than
> that.
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> Firebird-Devel<http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/Firebird-Devel>mailing
> list, web interface at
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
