On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:34:04 +0100, Michal Kubecek <m...@mk-sys.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:13:42PM +0100, Stefan Heymann wrote: >> >> Then let's skip 2.5.3 and name the new thing 2.5.4. Everyone will >> understand that "fixed in 2.5.3" also means that it's still fixed in >> later versions. > > This would still mean such 2.5.4 would miss a lot of fixes and > improvements 2.5.3.x already running around have. > > I guess there is no perfect solution with the versions we have now but > to avoid making the version more messy than necessary, this emergency > release should IMHO be called 2.5.2, not 2.5.3 or even higher. So the > best (or rather least bad) is IMHO 2.5.2.26540
Personally, I think it is better (simpler) to release it under 2.5.3; it is the next point release it just doesn't contain everything announced earlier. People will understand that far more easily than having two 2.5.2 versions. And I'd assume most people that run snapshots will be aware of this and its implications. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
