On 25-01-2014 12:30, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 25.01.2014 18:22, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> >> Adding some keyword for now may cause future problems when schemas exist. > > What's the problem of treating ::PROC1 (syntax just for example) as a > global procedure PROC1 in the current schema? Or do you mean the > situation when multiple schemas are implicitly available to the current > user? >
I don't know. To answer this, I would need detailed spec of how schemas will work in Firebird. Will it be user-based or not, how multiple schemas will interact, how current no-schema objects will be supported, how the namespace will be shared between main objects and schemas, how it be the prefix syntax. AFAIK, Oracle does not treat this outside the schema-handling. I think it's much safer to think on this when designing schemas than adding something now that may cause future problems. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
