Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <adrian...@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:41:40 +0400:
> > I don't know. To answer this, I would need detailed spec of how schemas > will work in Firebird. > > Will it be user-based or not, how multiple schemas will interact, how > current no-schema objects will be supported, how the namespace will be > shared between main objects and schemas, how it be the prefix syntax. > > AFAIK, Oracle does not treat this outside the schema-handling. I think > it's much safer to think on this when designing schemas than adding > something now that may cause future problems. > > I do not like the scheme made in Oracle. User and the scheme does not have the same thing. I'm much closer to realization schemas PostgreSQL. As for use of the procedures of the same name, in the presence of schemas it certainly an output. However there will be a problem of homonymy of schemas and packets. However current situation should be reflected in Release Notes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
