03.04.2014 18:26, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > I'm not sure I like the extra load put on the memory manager.
It is transaction-local memory pool. > I'd rather > think about replacing the original tra_undo_record buffer with a stack > of record buffers ready for reuse. IMHO, this is unnecessary code complication. Transaction is not in the position to predict time of life of returned buffers. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
