On 07/22/14 15:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 22/07/2014 07:54, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 07/22/14 14:41, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >>> 21.07.2014 18:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >>> >>>> Ahh - it's related with multiple inheritance and rtti. Luckily we do not >>>> use both in interfaces. >>> Just for clarity - besides that, we must neither use virtual destructors >> Definitely not. >> Instead dtor release() function is used. >> > How we'll deal with warnings about class with virtual methods without > virtual destructors? I didn't found a clever way. > > Current clang++ build is full of them. And note, globally disable them > are not a option, as these headers are going to be used by users.
g++ sometimes ago also used to raise such warning. But sometimes later one clever guy in development team found that people should have a way to describe pure virtual interfaces. Presence of such warning for a pure virtual class was accepted to be a bug which was fixed. Unfortunately in clang++ this bug is still present. How can we fix buggy compiler? :-( ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
