Can you demonstrate this problem?

But even if it can't be demonstrated, the name mapping argument is still worth 
considering.




> On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Dmitry Yemanov <firebi...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> 22.07.2014 15:31, Jim Starkey wrote:
> 
>> Why do you care?
> 
> If the C++ interface (pure virtual) is expected to be used outside the 
> Firebird project (by other C++ applications) or even by different 
> Firebird versions (e.g. newer server loading the older engine), then we 
> must care. You cannot extend the interface by an overloaded function and 
> expect its binary compatibility with the prior interface version.
> 
> If the only public API is a [machine-generated] language-neutral plain C 
> stuff, then I don't care. This is not what we have at hands though.
> 
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
> search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
> Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
> search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
> Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to