On 12/08/2014 17:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On 12-8-2014 21:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 12/08/2014 16:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >>> Am I correct to understand, that in the C API isc_dsql_prepare_m will >>> allow me to specify the database information items to request together >>> with the statement prepare, allowing me to circumvent the allocation and >>> handling of XSQLDA, and instead gives we a response buffer that I can >>> process the same as I already do in the wire protocol implementation? >>> >>> >> Yes, you're correct. > Thanks, > > Does something similar apply to the other _m methods? > > Yes, and the _m methods are the ones we put in the new API.
Non-_m (who uses SQLDA) methods are wrappers for the _m methods. So as you see, as you need to maintain methods dealing with buffers, it's probably better to depend on the _m methods instead of SQLDA/SQLVAR too. You can look the details in why.cpp. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
