> > I do not see SMB 2 as an appropriate for use for database functions. > > I was confused by SMB2/2.1 as well. I thought it might be good to investigate > what they are doing (preventing problems, how the share is opened, ...).
I am not aware of SQL Server running on SMB anything other than SMB v3. It would be far too dangerous. The most of the changes they made are outlined in the cases which I created in the tracker -- these came from the notes of a TechEd 2013 presentation on application changes for SMB v3. I will review the tracker cases and if I didn't include the appropriate link to the presentation, I will add. Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
