25.09.2014 21:58, Leyne, Sean wrote: > Your posts suggest that you have fundamental (almost philosophical) problems > with the idea of using SMB v3 storage for FB purposes.
I have one fundamental problem indeed: I know what clusters can do and what they cannot. Unfortunately, they have no magic behind. > My responses have tried to point out that SMB v3 is significantly different > from your experience/thinking and it is a real candidate for use with FB -- > as long as the necessary changes are made. My responses have tried to point out that storage cluster with shared storage is pointless. As well a cluster with master node and asynchronous propagation of changes is a way to loose data if master node die in between. As the result, SMB3 storage cluster can be useful for Firebird only if it has separate storages for nodes and synchronous propagation of changes. But it doesn't. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
