On 08/10/2014 07:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a package with two routines in it, one of these routines is
> called by a trigger.
> In RDB$DEPEDENCIES, I can see that a package that uses a table, has a
> record
> with RDB$DEPENDENT_TYPE of 19 (“package body”) on a Table (“type 0”).
> The dependency for the trigger, with the EXECUTE PROCEDURE statement
> is listed
> as:
> <trigger> has a dependency on <routine> in <package>, type “procedure”
> (5).
> Now, there’s IMO two things wrong with dependencies:
> 1) there’s no specific type for “stored function” (dependencies are
> both registered
> with type 5, “stored procedure”)

How do you see that? It's not what I see. Type 15 is used for functions.

> 2) is the trigger depending on the –package- or on a –procedure- that
> happens to
> be inside a package?

What would be the practical difference in Firebird? I see it's the same
as fields.

> Mind you, when something depends on a field, the registered dependency
> type is
> 0 (table), and there’s an entry in rdb$field_name.
> To be consistent, the DEPENDED_ON_NAME would be the package name, and
> an additional column for “package routine” should be available, not
> the other
> way around, like it is now.

A "package routine" column would be insufficient, as procedures and
functions can have identical names.

It would need two columns, one for procedure and another for function.

Seems awful.


> The current solution seems inconsistent to me.
>
Yes, but let see what others think.


Adriano


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to