Hi, Has something been decided with regard to this issue yet?
With regards, Martijn Tonies Upscene Productions 09.10.2014 17:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 09/10/2014 10:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote: >> >You could use FIELD_NAME, for backwards compatibility, but also add a >> >"child object type" column, for the package extension to distinguish >> >between >> >functions/procedures/future items. > Use a field with a name for another thing is also not good. It doesn't matter, because the only purpose of this data is forming an error message. It would be enough if user can derive from the message why (s)he cannot drop or alter something in the database. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
