On 11/10/14 18:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 10/11/2014 12:51, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> I see that you remove method physically, but this is not good idea >> after beta1 release. >> I see 2 options: >> - keep dummy method, >> or >> - do minimum(!!!) backport to B1 >> >> A. >> > Replying to fb-devel. > > I plan to rework every needed bit of the API that may make it better > before the final release.
And in 3.0.1 too? :) > So IMO, there is no way to maintain compatibility with what we have now. > > Since our users do not test alpha versions, and our fellow developers do > not like I tell here they are wrong, we'll have a bad API for the rest > of Firebird life or we fix them as things are found. Or we're just not > prepared to go beta, which will not be good either, as [start read that > paragraph again]. That's all interesting - but getting serious - where were you with that suggestions before? As far as I remember we have a decision to have API/ODS fixed after beta1 release. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
