> > You has always the option to clone the tree, fix everything in the > > best way, as you're wiser than everybody, and submit a patch. > > Such patch will be rejected for sure (even if someone look at it at all) > because > it will revert interfaces to plain abstract classes + clean autoupgrade out > completely. > What's the point then?..
What's the point of our complaint? If you need something that was idled/deprecated years ago, why are you 'blaming' Adriano for the fact that you will need to "do work" for your fork? You seem to want to throw away anything that it "inconvenient" for your purposes. At least your changes would provide no benefit to the overall project. Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
