On Monday, August 24, 2015, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes < adrian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You're here mainly to build ideas for your products, not for Firebird, > so it's not about open source. > > Sorry, but you're the first to complain about early expose to new ideas. It must be very distracting. However, if AmorphousDB ever becomes useful, I do plan to deploy it open source. I don't do initial development under open source to avoid the race among open source developers to see who can kill a new ideas first and deadest. It's not at all unique to Firebird, unfortunately. But I'd much rather see where new ideas take me. Some work, some don't. You can't tell without going there. By the way, MySQL developers were much more idea-adverse than Firebird. You'd have thought that the idea of error code stability across versions would be a hit, but no. Still, I'm happy to see that Vulcan is still being mined for technology. Maybe, in a decade or so, you can take advantage of ideas being developed now. An open source software who attacker has physical access to it can be > replaced with a compromised one who get keys. > > One could have a secure "decrypt server", which will be there just to > not have a single proper server setup. > > > Adriano > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel > -- Jim Starkey
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
