25.02.2017 21:40, Jiří Činčura wrote: > OK, after reading the thread again and again, I think I'm starting to > understand what was Vlad shooting for. And I think his implementation > makes sense (so I'm fine moving it forward). This also makes sense > reading some of Vlad's scenarios in docs (although I see it more like > client-side only feature). > > *But.* With that I see another *highly* related feature. Some kind of > resource governor. In our case (Sean, Mark, originally me) the simplest > form of _working_ time consumed (so it's disk IO, index IO, memory, CPU > all together - I think we don't have resources for extra detailed > implementation). That would be only server-side configuration (_maybe_ > option for DPB), because I see it strictly as DBA safety mechanism.
You absolutely right about resource governor. As for configuration it better should\could be implemented as kind of user\user group quota's, i think. But this is another story and another level of complexity. Thanks, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
