24.03.2017 19:39, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 03/24/17 20:26, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> 24.03.2017 17:57, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> On 03/24/17 17:53, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>>
>>>>      So far we have no agreement on what is "correct result". Current 
>>>> implementation
>>>> changed well known old behaviour not claiming it as a bug. I'd say it 
>>>> looks like
>>>> a bug itself.
>>> Vlad, looking at sql2008 (part2, foundation, 11.10 - alter table
>>> statement) one can read in <add column definition> that when new column
>>> is added, and this is base (not generated) column, and this is not
>>> identity column then every value in this column is it's default value.
>>> And it's mentioned in <alter column definition> <set column default
>>> clause> that new default value is stored in column descriptor, but
>>> nobody mentions that it should be changed for existing records.
>>>
>>> I.e. according to standard old (interbase origined) behavior was a bug
>>> and current one is correct.
 >>
>>     I already show that info from standard but can't make same conclusion.
>> I see it as not specified.
>
> Well, it's also not specified that rand() output should not be placed
> into a column for which default value was changed :-)

   I consider standard as document which we should read curefully and follow
strictly. Such documents should be created in a such way to not allow ambiguity
and describe every possible and not possible conditions. Unfortunately, this is
not always true.

   As for rand() output - i already show example when value returned by known 
empty
field with default can't be found at system dictionary.

> What must be done is specified exactly. And we should suppose that in
> all other aspects data stored in database should not be changed -

   What data is *stored* ?

> without that addition any operation on database can randomly modify it
> in unpredictable way.

   Sure. But not in our case ;)

Regards,
Vlad


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to