05.05.2017 21:10, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 05/05/2017 14:43, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> 05.05.2017 20:01, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>> %type <uintVal> snap_shot >>> snap_shot >>> : SNAPSHOT >>> | SNAPSHOT TABLE >>> | SNAPSHOT TABLE STABILITY >>> + | SNAPSHOT SHARING FROM <N> >> SNAPSHOT BASED ON <N> >> ? >> > Do you think with this words it's clear that the new transaction uses > the same snapshot used in <N>, instead of incorrectly saying that it > will use <N> as the snapshot for the new transaction? > > Thinking in these terms, I'm more inclined to adapt (renaming SHARING to > SHARED) Vlad's syntax to: > > SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SNAPSHOT SHARED FROM <N>
For me both variants are OK :) Probably native english speakers could offer something better and less ambiguous. Also, i offer to add additional rule for transaction which should export its snapshot data (it allows to avoid export by all transactions), something like: SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SNAPSHOT WITH SHARED SNAPSHOT Not sure i like it :) Regards, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
