Hello: Thanks for the answer
>That, the Services api, the isql support, etc .. are Firebird Specific >features that is the reason >you can't use the DbProviderFactory ( that is a base class ) to create >them. I knew that :-D, but i wanted to have my thoughts confirmed by somebody like you :-D >that depends on what you are doing ;) and anyway you can the same >problem if you make usage of specific classes >of other providers. yes, you're right, it's obvious now for me that i cannot write fully provider-aware Database class, unless it deals only with common objects like Command, Connection, Transaction. So far i have to deal with EventNotifiers, Backups and others, i will have to rewrite the code anyway according to specific Provider abilities and services. Thanks anyway for the answer :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FirebirdClientFactory-tf2257525.html#a6266389 Sent from the firebird-net-provider forum at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
