Hi, have some questions, may be somebody can help :-) As I understand the usage of DbProviderFactory instead of using FbObjects to create connections, commands and so on, makes the code more common and make it possible to quickly change the provider if necessary without code changes. But there are a lot of objects like FbDatabaseInfo, FbBackup/Restore and many other, that cannot be created using DbProviderFactory (FirebirdClientFactory). The conclusion is that if i change database server to for example MSSQL, i will have to search for replacement for this objects, and yes, change the code to certain extend.
So is my question finally :-) : am i right or have i missed something, can i create this specific Firebird objects with DbProviderFactory or not ? If not, there is no big reason to make my code using now Factory instead of creating objects, because in case of migration to another database, i would have to change the code anyway (yes i know, i would have to change more, but no really much more) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FirebirdClientFactory-tf2257525.html#a6262071 Sent from the firebird-net-provider forum at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
