Hi *,
is here anybody who I'd like to put FirebirdClient into (long) test
under (preferably) some load?
I started work on async support and with that I'll also have to redo
all the lock-ing there. Because these are either wrong or not
necessary (and often both). But there's also a lot of magic happening
thanks to old [1] code that's executed under GC. And that's hard to
test.
I'd like to redesign it completely (and not only this, have you seen
i.e. connection pooling...), but until somebody give a few months of
time, it's just wish.
[1] Let's face it, the code is crappy. Redesign would be nice. But I
don't blame anybody, 5-10 years ago it was different story. .NET was
different (a lot) and we had different understanding of how it works
and should work (and how we should design code).
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
