Hi *, is here anybody who I'd like to put FirebirdClient into (long) test under (preferably) some load?
I started work on async support and with that I'll also have to redo all the lock-ing there. Because these are either wrong or not necessary (and often both). But there's also a lot of magic happening thanks to old [1] code that's executed under GC. And that's hard to test. I'd like to redesign it completely (and not only this, have you seen i.e. connection pooling...), but until somebody give a few months of time, it's just wish. [1] Let's face it, the code is crappy. Redesign would be nice. But I don't blame anybody, 5-10 years ago it was different story. .NET was different (a lot) and we had different understanding of how it works and should work (and how we should design code). -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider