>Do you think the annotations will be better? Better than what? Your concern was about different naming schemes, I suggested how it can be resolved via column annotations and custom name providers. I don't know other options for this.
>How is the generator creation (if it does not exists) going to be handled? Or >are we going to leave that to manual change of Up method in migration? IMO generator creation is an implementation detail that user shouldn't bother about. Generator creation is a part of a table creation. >Do you have some more info for this. I'm sure that there were issues about identity columns. The current implementation CreateDatabaseIfExists doesn't create generators in any case, we patched sources to do that. Also, bool fields don't have CHECK IN (0, 1) annotation and so on. I need time to provide additional info for this. On 30 September 2015 at 22:11, Jiří Činčura <j...@cincura.net> wrote: > OK, so let's talk about Migrations. > >> Identity columns. > > Do you think the annotations will be better? How is the generator > creation (if it does not exists) going to be handled? Or are we going to > leave that to manual change of Up method in migration? > >> 4. One more issue I remembered. Dbs created with Initial migration and via >> CreateDatabaseIfNotExists have different underlying scheme in part of names. >> I think this should be also fixed. > > Do you have some more info for this. > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
