On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 11:45, Геннадий Забула wrote: > >Do you think the annotations will be better? > Better than what? Your concern was about different naming schemes, I > suggested how it can be resolved via column annotations and custom > name providers. I don't know other options for this.
No. You talked about generator/identity columns. Possibly replacing the interface. > >How is the generator creation (if it does not exists) going to be handled? > >Or are we going to leave that to manual change of Up method in migration? > IMO generator creation is an implementation detail that user shouldn't > bother about. Generator creation is a part of a table creation. That's definitely not. You can have one generator for all tables (and it's even better). > >Do you have some more info for this. > I'm sure that there were issues about identity columns. The current > implementation CreateDatabaseIfExists doesn't create generators in any > case, we patched sources to do that. Also, bool fields don't have > CHECK IN (0, 1) annotation and so on. > I need time to provide additional info for this. Well, the default initializers are using different path. These existed before migrations. The code is different (and also the feature set). It also works with EDMX and CF, while migrations are (currently) CF only. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
