> ---In [email protected], <ts@...> wrote : > >> From a throughput perspective, this would mean: > > >> IB XE3 => 0,918 MB/s >> IB XE7 => 1,896 MB/s >> FB 3 => 3,282 MB/s > > >> To be honest, astonishing low numbers in 2015, for all three. > > To be even more honest, measure time of restore without building indices and > non-table metadata objects. Else your statement is about nothing, sorry
Ehm, just did some math on Karol's results. ;-) And I guess his numbers present the entire restore time or did I miss something? > Regards, > Vlad > > PS I don't say Firebird is able to restore at full speed of HDD sequential > write, but your > conclusion is very far from truth. IMHO, of course. Well, I haven't said that a Firebird restore is that slow in GENERAL as shown with the numbers above. It is in Karol's environment. -- With regards, Thomas Steinmaurer http://www.upscene.com Professional Tools and Services for Firebird FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.
