> From a bit of exploring the first 2 features: > "fs.firebug.menu.Log Activation URIs" doesn't seem to do anything
> (nothing ever seen in console regardless of activation status) Do you use Firebug 1.5a20? I am attaching a screenshot how it should look like. > "fs.Firebug.menu.On By Default" makes me wonder if the lowercase > "firebug" above is a typo. yes, it was a typo, fixed. http://getfirebug.com/releases/firestarter/1.5/fireStarter-0.1.a2.xpi Please try this new version and let me know if you see the log in the console. If not, it would be nice to know whether there are some error messages in the Firebug Tracing Console (Firebug->Open Firebug Tracing) > Will we be seeing an option for what I will attempt to describe as: > "auto-start and run Firebug minimized for whitelist URLs"? > (Here I'm attempting to name/summarize the problem that so many people > are writing about regarding wanting Firebug to "just STAY on darnit" > for their whitelist so they never have to think about activation > again, just as they didn't have to in <=1.3. Also known as > "conflation of visibility and activation" and "have to reload page & > reproduce to catch logging" and a few other descriptions.) Yes, there have been a lot of requests for this and it's something I would like to have a support for in the extension. Honza > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of nod > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:00 PM > To: Firebug > Subject: Re: Extension for advanced activation features > > > Excellent! This is great news. > > From a bit of exploring the first 2 features: > "fs.firebug.menu.Log Activation URIs" doesn't seem to do anything > (nothing ever seen in console regardless of activation status) > "fs.Firebug.menu.On By Default" makes me wonder if the lowercase > "firebug" above is a typo. > > Will we be seeing an option for what I will attempt to describe as: > "auto-start and run Firebug minimized for whitelist URLs"? > (Here I'm attempting to name/summarize the problem that so many people > are writing about regarding wanting Firebug to "just STAY on darnit" > for their whitelist so they never have to think about activation > again, just as they didn't have to in <=1.3. Also known as > "conflation of visibility and activation" and "have to reload page & > reproduce to catch logging" and a few other descriptions.) > > Again, thank you thank you for responding with this action and working > group. (I won't even mention the "you used to be able to have > multiple Firebug external windows open at once" issue as it's so > secondary to getting to a place where I never have to think about > activation and whitelists and can just get stuff done!) > > Thanks, > James > > On Jul 28, 9:07 am, Jan Odvarko <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have started (FWG) working on an extension called FireStarter that > > provides enhancements for the Firebug's activation > model.http://getfirebug.com/releases/extensions.html > > > > The motivation is as follows: > > > > - All required/advanced activation features can be implemented into > > the extension without bothering other users who like what is there in > > Firebug by default. > > > > - Development/release cycle of the extension is shorter (comparing to > > Firebug), which allows to get feedback on new features faster. > > > > - We can also use the extension as an incubator for proved features > > (according to the real user experience) and backport the most > > successful ideas into Firebug core. > > > > Description of the two implemented enhancements is > here:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/07/22/firebug-1-5a18/ > > > > Honza > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
