On Jul 28, 10:59 am, nod <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> Will we be seeing an option for what I will attempt to describe as:
> "auto-start and run Firebug minimized for whitelist URLs"?
> (Here I'm attempting to name/summarize the problem that so many people
> are writing about regarding wanting Firebug to "just STAY on darnit"
> for their whitelist so they never have to think about activation
> again, just as they didn't have to in <=1.3. Also known as
> "conflation of visibility and activation" and "have to reload page &
> reproduce to catch logging" and a few other descriptions.)
Can you explain what you think "so many people" want? I can't figure
it out.
How is "auto-start and run Firebug minimized for whitelist URLs" any
different from "minimize"? I mean if you minimize, then the page is
whitelisted and firebug is running.
Does anyone have a test case where Firebug 1.4 does not stay on for a
page they have whitelisted?
The only thing I can guess that matches what you describe here is the
following scenario:
1. Open getfirebug.com
2. open firebug (UI is visible),
3. reload. Firebug is debugging the page.
4. New tab, http://groups.google.com/group/firebug
5. Don't open Firebug. Firebug is gray.
6. Switch back to the tab with getfirebug.com. Discover that all
console logging and ajax traffic has been ignored while I read the
newsgroup.
Is that the scenario? Other wise I still don't get what you are
saying.
jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
