On Jul 28, 2:23 pm, reddaly <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> > Nevertheless I am interested in any incremental suggestions about
> > function names.
>
> My suggestion is to inspect the function object for an explicit, user-
> defined name.
I've heard this suggestion before, I didn't understand it. If you
don't want anonymous functions, why don't you just name them? I mean
aren't function names are exactly equal to explicit user-defined
names?
jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
