Here are some exceptions I see (even with new profile). I usually get
them when I use debugger; to stop JS at some line, then wait for 5
minutes, then Refresh-browser(while Firebug is still holding/
controlling JS). And once I hit these exceptions, the only way to get-
around is to completely-close firefox and reopen.


Exception #1. Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element true Window
#1


Exception #2. uncaught exception: _FirebugCommandLine init failed in
http://rr.zimbra.com:7070/zimbra/#1 because TypeError:
window.loadFirebugConsole is not a function


There is one more exception that I know appears and I will update when
I hit it.


On Aug 2, 10:46 am, goodtest <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have tried using new profile, but it didn't help much. Also, going
> by bug count doesnt really help. How many *major* issues and *major*
> annoyances would help.
>
> Anyway, here are the specific issues:
> 1. If one of the object is null or undefined, it won't complain - BIG
> issue. It only complain if we have "stop on all errors" turned ON.
> 2. If we have "stop on all errors" turned ON, it shows the error right-
> on-the-javascript-code. Its very hard to read whats wrong.
> 3. Every now and then "New Watch Expression" stops working. i.e.
> throws some NSException. I usually see this after I keep firebug
> stopped at a debug-point for 5 minutes or so and then try to evaluate
> some javascript expression.
>
> 4. Earlier, we could enable/disable firebug per website. This was
> extremely helpful since, I didnt have to manually turn-off when I go
> to yahoo.com, and turn-on when i go to myapplication.com. It was
> automatic  but currently, its very annoying I will have to remember
> all the time.
> 5. Because of 4, if we forget to turn-ON the debugger on
> mypplication.com, and then say we realized that that and turn-ON
> firebug, we still have to  REFRESH browser for it to start working.
>
> On Aug 2, 8:06 am, johnjbarton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > First I'll say that we would not have released 1.4 if we had any
> > evidence that 1.4 was too buggy to be useful.
>
> > "bugginess" is hard to measure, but if we go by the number of bug
> > reports with test cases we'd have:
> >    83 for v 1.2 or eariler (mostly 1.2)
> >    29 for v 1.3
> >    72 for v 1.4
> >  184 total defects and enhancements with test cases, 
> > see:http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list?can=2&q=label%3ATest-case-a...
>
> > Even though these numbers suggest 1.4 is 'buggier' than 1.3, I believe
> > a large number of the 1.4 cases are dups or have been fixed by work we
> > have completed. We have not had a chance to check for these.
>
> > Based on your list of problems, I would guess that your Firefox
> > configuration is broken. If you install Firebug in a new Firefox
> > profile, my bet is that these problems will all go away. 
> > Seehttp://groups.google.com/group/firebug/web/faq-about-firebug.
>
> > If this does not help, let us know. And if you want 1.3, all versions
> > of Firebug are available athttp://getfirebug.com/releases.
>
> > jjb
>
> > On Aug 1, 10:40 pm, goodtest <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I love-love-love firebug and use it every day. But every since Firefox
> > > 3.5 and firebug 1.4 came up, its giving me headache.
> > > - Doesn't keep itself ON
> > > - Crashes every now and then
> > > - Doesnt recognize Script errors
>
> > > Earlier versions were gem, and I don't know who came up with 1.4
> > > version. I want to go back to earlier 1.3 ((
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to