Ok now I see what you mean. The representation we use for the object changed. What don't you like about the new representation?
jjb On Dec 1, 12:33 pm, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > You can run this: > > try { > var tst = new testObj(); > > }catch(e){ > console.log(e) > } > > in Firebug 1.5.4 and 1.6 and compare the outputs. Or > > try { > var tst = new testObj(); > > }catch(e){ > debugger; > } > > and compare the e object in each version. > > (Provided you don't have testObj set up of course. :) ) > > On Dec 1, 2:23 pm, John J Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Dec 1, 10:15 am, Nadav Givoni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Then it's overriding the method somehow, because I've reverted back to > > > Which method? > > > > FireBug 1.5.4 and the argument passed into the catch is the standard Error > > > object, in 1.6 it's passing in the object in which the error was caught > > > in. > > > If you post a test case then we can know what you are talking about. > > > jjb > > > > N > > > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:09 PM, John J Barton > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Firebug does not pass arguments into the catch statement, I guess you > > > > have some other problem. > > > > > jjb > > > > > On Dec 1, 10:02 am, Nak1 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The arguments passed into using 1.6 into the catch statement are > > > > > definitely different then the arguments passed into the 1.5 version of > > > > > Firebug. > > > > > > Nak1 > > > > > > On Dec 1, 9:43 am, John J Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 1, 6:45 am, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I just installed Firebug 1.6 and it seems to be overriding our > > > > > > > try/ > > > > > > > catch error handling code. This is basically code that catches the > > > > > > > error and does a console.log of the error object. But now instead > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > console in Firebug is stopping at the error and displaying the > > > > > > > error > > > > > > > message that links to the line of the error in the script. Is > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > any way to turn that behavior off so that our error handling code > > > > will > > > > > > > run? > > > > > > > I don't think Firebug knows how to do what you describe. Some things > > > > > > you can try: > > > > > > 1) Firebug > Firebug Icon Menu > Options > Reset all. Does it help? > > > > > > 2) Install Firebug in a new Firefox profile, Does it help? > > > > > > 3) Report a bug,http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list > > > > > > > jjb > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > "Firebug" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<firebug%[email protected]> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > Nadav Givoni > > > [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
