Yes, I was wrong about the support with the alphas, it might be just
my memory or a mixup with something else.
Keep up with these nice updates :-)
The only thing that I would ask is that unless there's something
really important about the upgrade, not opening the "what's new" tab
on first launch would be better.


On 9 sep, 07:57, Sebo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alfonso is right. We can't keep the support for old versions of
> Firefox, because we simply don't have time to do so. For implementing
> new features we would always need to have a fallback for old versions,
> that don't support them.
> You can read about which versions of Firefox the different Firebug
> versions support athttp://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#Compatibility.
>
> Alfonso, please note, that the latest development version of Firebug
> (currently 1.9.0a1) is always supporting the latest version of Firefox
> (currently 9.0a1).
>
> Sebastian
>
> On Sep 8, 7:29 pm, alfonsoml <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > So you don't have the time to upgrade your browser, and instead you
> > want that other people devote their time to support the version that
> > you've chosen to stay with?
>
> > Just for how long should they stay supporting it?
>
> > And when you finally decide to upgrade, I think that you'll expect a
> > fully supported and polished version of Firebug that doesn't have any
> > problem with the current version of Firefox. Just because it's easy to
> > double the number of hours in each day and even fix back the Firefox
> > bugs that caused the problems or limitations in Firebug
>
> > I instead would rather see a shift to support even Aurora, as that's
> > the version that will be released in 3 months and it's better to find
> > bugs as soon as possible to fix regressions in Firefox.
>
> > On 1 sep, 00:21, Astara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Ya know, there are ALOT of people still using 3.x (just upgraded to
> > > 3.6.21)...
>
> > > You don't hear as much from them as they generally aren't in the forefront
> > > of FF development...BUT, one shouldn't assume that such is due to them 
> > > being
> > > non-techies or not interested...  Some are overloaded with too many other
> > > things and have stuck with the more stable (according to crash 
> > > statisitics)
> > > series because they don't want to devote alot of time to figuring out how 
> > > to
> > > upgrade or replace their 100+ extensions..(among other reasons)...)...
>
> > > It SURE would be nice to have those bug fixes -- even feature adds 
> > > available
> > > -- as 3.x is still stuck
> > > with the Firebug-1.7.2 version...
>
> > > I'm just sayin'.... ;-)..

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.

Reply via email to