> Just because 30% of the people haven't upgraded... not just me... > Are you trying > to make me feel like I'm somehow all alone in not upgrading just yet? > > Just for how long should they stay supporting it? > > ---- > It depends, but usually when the user base gets down below some > fractional value like 1/3, 1/4, 1/5... depends on the product and > how it is used.
1/3 is 33%, so according to the stats that you're using it might be the time to stop caring about that version. > > Also depends on how well the old product works or if it crashes or > has features that > just are broken. I don't remember Firebug ever crashing when I used older versions. You might try to start with a new profile. > Usually I expect a downgrade in quality when I upgrade. Ok, here's your real problem. The rest of the world expects improvements when they do any upgrade, and so they prefer to move forward and report if there's any new problem because the reality is that usually there are no new problems and instead new features and bug fixes. > > I instead would rather see a shift to support even Aurora, as that's > > the version that will be released in 3 months and it's better to find > > bugs as soon as possible to fix regressions in Firefox. > > ---- > It is very troublesome for you to indicate how incompatible Aurora > is with previous versions. As other people have pointed out, the development of Firebug is tested on Aurora, and you're readying too much in my words -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
