Btw. here's a list of issue reports related to the JSDT validation:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=JSDT&content=[validation]

Sebastian

On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:55:26 AM UTC+1, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
>
> Ah, you want to have a look at Firebug's code.
> I'm also using Eclipse when working on Firebug, though I don't give much 
> attention to the errors reported by JSDT. Most of the reports are just 
> wrong. E.g. it says there are three errors at line 399 of 
> /Firebug/extension/content/firebug/lib/url.js<https://github.com/firebug/firebug/blob/5fc314916ada97112911790e56bfffe0cd09051f/extension/content/firebug/lib/url.js#L399>
> :
>
>    - Syntax error on token "Invalid Character", delete this token
>    - Syntax error on token "(", ArrayLiteralHeader expected
>    - Syntax error on token "]", delete this token
>    
> while the line is totally correct.
> Also the third supposed syntax error is even not listed inside the *
> Problems* view.
> Regarding your example with "define([...], function(...) {...});" (for 
> which you didn't upload the screenshots btw.) it says "The left-hand side 
> of an assignment must be a variable", which is also wrong because it's 
> not an assignment but a function call.
> So that feature of JSDT is obviously totally buggy.
>
> Anyway, if you want to work on Firebug and provide patches or write an 
> extension for it, you're very welcome.
> Happy New Year!
>
> Sebastian
>
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 8:05:02 PM UTC+1, Rob Roy wrote:
>>
>> I've downloaded Firebug Lite and it loads the single firebug-lite.js file 
>> into Eclipse with only warnings, however, I'm running FB 1.11.1 in Firefox 
>> and am most familiar with that UI.  My preference is to work with FB 
>> Extension for FF.
>>
>> On Friday, December 28, 2012 1:51:59 PM UTC-5, Rob Roy wrote:
>>>
>>> I've loaded Firebug extension for Firefox into Eclipse to examine the 
>>> code to better understand how FB works.  When loading into Eclipse, there 
>>> are numerous JS language validation errors as described below.  Since 
>>> Eclipse's JSDT is the gold standard for JS development, I wanted to see if 
>>> others had the same problem and if they did, what corrective action(s) 
>>> could be recommended.  Is there a recommended development environment for 
>>> FB?  I would think that many others are using Eclipse and have also tried 
>>> to load the FB code.
>>>
>>> On Friday, December 28, 2012 6:31:43 AM UTC-5, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you talking about Firebug <https://getfirebug.com/whatisfirebug>or 
>>>> Firebug 
>>>> Lite <https://getfirebug.com/firebuglite>? Note that Firebug is a 
>>>> Firefox extension.
>>>> Also I'm not sure what you want to do exactly. Do you want to integrate 
>>>> it into your website or somehow into Eclipse?
>>>> You can try the small Firebug Lite download from this thread:
>>>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/firebug/dSMLzLcoxpc/rqwNRVuYbGMJ
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:18:55 PM UTC+1, Rob Roy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I realize this is a very old post that I'm responding to, however, I'm 
>>>>> also have the same problems when loading the full FireBug .ZIP file into 
>>>>> an 
>>>>> Eclipse project.  Here are the specific details.
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently downloaded the latest .ZIP of the Firefox compatible 
>>>>> FireBug code and created an Eclipse project from this code. I'm running:
>>>>>
>>>>> Eclipse Java EE IDE for Web Developers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Version: Juno Service Release 1
>>>>> Build id: 20120920-0800
>>>>>
>>>>> Java: JRE7
>>>>>
>>>>> The javascript precompiler is throwing many errors on the CommonJS 
>>>>> AMD-style of "define([...], function(...) {...});" (see the uploaded 
>>>>> screen 
>>>>> shots). Many of the files don't have errors, but about 50 of the files 
>>>>> using this syntax are throwing errors and I can not identify any 
>>>>> differences or fixes to correct these errors. I prefer to use Eclipse for 
>>>>> Javascript development due to these kinds of tools, but, given that the 
>>>>> FireBug source has gone through extensive testing, could this be an error 
>>>>> in the JSDT precompiler (or syntax validator)?
>>>>>
>>>>> The compilation error is "The left-hand side of an assignment must be 
>>>>> a variable".
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just one of many types of errors that I'm finding.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, September 11, 2008 2:00:10 AM UTC-4, Robert Mark Bram 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All, 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using Eclipse 3.4 (Ganymeded) which has Javascript tooling in it 
>>>>>> (JSDT). When I make a Javascript project and put the Firebug Lite 
>>>>>> tools in it (firebug-lite.js and pi.js) around 200 errors come up for 
>>>>>> these two files. Has anyone tried this before? Is there some other 
>>>>>> setup I need to do? 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for any assistance! 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rob 
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug

Reply via email to