Thanks a lot for your inputs. This is very helpful. Best, Pulkit
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:52:58 PM UTC+5:30, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > > On Feb 5, 5:43 pm, Pulkit Bhuwalka <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Honza, > > > > Thanks for your reply. I'll take a look at how its done. > > > > Could you let me know what led to firebug moving out of requirejs? It > would > > help me take a better decision on my project. > > While I think RequireJS is great (and I personally use it in my other > web-based projects) > it's relatively heavy for Firebug since solving many scenarios > (including > cross browser support). > > AMD syntax in Firebug is simple and we don't need such complex > support. > So, we decided to use simple loader (~200 lines) that is easier to > debug and > also a bit faster. > > Honza > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
