Hi Guys!
Am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 12:54:24 UTC+2 schrieb Christ van Willegen: > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Markus Staab > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hi Honza, > > > > added a sample code how things could work from a api-consumer > perspective. > > https://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=7452 > > > > Should we move the discussion into the issue, or do you think its worth > also > > using the maillinglist? > > It's weird to put this in the reply... This way, you can't measure the > timing of your generated HTML, CSS, JS, but only JSON replies from the > server. AND you need to make sure that this doesn't influence your JS > application. > > I think it's better to put this info in the reply headers. > the posted snippet is just sample code. One could use http headers, json, cookies or even async events using websockets. the only thing which the browser needs to support is console.timeStamp(<label>, <date>); everything else needs to be implemented by the api consumer. Is it more clear now? Thanks for your feedback, Markus > > Christ van Willegen > -- > 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/ca5aab57-cf46-48f8-af68-d42c89a58360%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
