Very good. I got a response within minutes from someone at a university
in Japan.
-Jason
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Joe Matusiewicz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:18:02 -0500
> From: Joe Matusiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joshua Chamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Netbus Scanner Response ?
>
> Its kinda funny we're discussing this. Just ten minutes ago I sent out an
> email about a scan from Japan that targeted 25 hosts on one of my networks
> that was targeted to port 2065. I'm puzzled by the choice of this port.
> But what do you think the odds are that someone in Japan will respond?
>
> -- Joe
>
>
> At 10:10 AM 3/19/99 -0500, Dominick Glavach wrote:
> >Joe:
> >
> >I agree. I would add that one should verfiy that the scan was not part
> >of a larger more successful attack before following up on the detected
> >attempt. -AND- document the all events for future reference.
> >
> >
> >--
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Dominick Glavach, IS Security/System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Concurrent Technologies Corporation 814/269-2469
>
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
AT&T Wireless Services
IT Security
UNIX Security Operations Specialist
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
