I'd say pretty slim! I can't even get responses from US ISP's! Hard to say why that port, probably thought no one would notice. Regards, Dennis Keller ADP Security Administrator DDSP-Z email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Joe Matusiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at internet01 Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at internet01; Colin Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at internet01; Joshua Chamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at internet01 Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at internet01 Subject: RE: Netbus Scanner Response ? Its kinda funny we're discussing this. Just ten minutes ago I sent out an email about a scan from Japan that targeted 25 hosts on one of my networks that was targeted to port 2065. I'm puzzled by the choice of this port. But what do you think the odds are that someone in Japan will respond? -- Joe At 10:10 AM 3/19/99 -0500, Dominick Glavach wrote: >Joe: > >I agree. I would add that one should verfiy that the scan was not part >of a larger more successful attack before following up on the detected >attempt. -AND- document the all events for future reference. > > >-- >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >Dominick Glavach, IS Security/System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Concurrent Technologies Corporation 814/269-2469 - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Keller;Dennis FN:Keller, Dennis ORG:DDC;DDSP NOTE:ASCE-ZW ADR;WORK:;DDSP-Z LABEL;WORK:DDSP-Z EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:19981217T170940Z END:VCARD
