It all depends on your definition of happy and successful; maybe they've
happily and successfully lowered their standards of robustness,
recoverability, security and whatever else might define the differences
between NT-based and other firewalls.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 8:38 AM
>Subject: RE: Why not NT?
>
>
>>What's so funny about this whole thread is these guys ranting and raving
>>about NT being not suitable for Firewall work, but many companies are
>>happily, and successfully, employing NT Firewalls anyway.
>>
>>Perhaps what they should really be asking is what do those companies know
>>about employing an NT-based system that they don't.
>>
>>Ignorance is not knowing.
>>Stupidity is the active pursuit of ignorance.
>>
>>Brian Steele
>>
>>
>>
>>-
>>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>>
>>
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
