>  I'll concede that the statute probably won't call this "intrusion" -- but
I 
>hope you're not too disappointed if I consider that a Red Herring.  The
claim 
>that has driven my participation in this thread isn't whether port-scanning

>is "*intrusion*", but whether it's *illegal*.

I think the terms are related.  For if a port scan is an intrusion, then it
is already illegal.  If it is not an intrusion, then it seems to be open to
interpretation.

I personally don't think anybody should worry about them, nor would I setup
an intrusion detection system to alert upon detecting such a scan.

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to