true, it is fairly secure but there have been some attacks for the older
ones, other then that and the crappy little pop ups it "seems" fine.
Spikeman
Vincent Power wrote:
For a standalone windows 9x machine, Conseal seems to be a fairly secure
firewall.
/Vincent Power
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Lissner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 2:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Conseal
>
> Hi all,
> Some of my friends are using for the protection of there systems(
mostly
> one
> computer ) when they are in the net from http://www.singnal9.com the
> Conseal
> firewall, is this enough security against some normal "attacks" like
to
> nuke, Ping DoS, TOD, Floods and things ??
> Is the Firewall secure or did someone know some "goals and backdoor"
??
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
___
/\ \ phase one of global domination in operation. hide all cows.
/::\ \
/:/\:\ \ Comments or Questions email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_\:\~\:\ \
/\ \:\ \:\__\
\:\ \:\ \/__/Spikeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\:\ \:\__\ http://spikeman.genocide2600.com *DOWN*
\:\/:/ / Spikeman's Denial of Service Site
\::/ /
\/__/ phase two of global domination in operation. hide all lions.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
